Architectural types are defined by identifying similarities inherent in objects, whether due to their form or program or both. Their manifestations result from a process of development characterised by the adaptation of the type to its environment – with territorial, social and economic factors. Some program related types evolve and others disappear. The dormitory-room-type has a long cultural tradition, and today it is a rather marginal architectural phenomenon. 

The collective dormitory was replaced by the individual sleeping and the unitarian space was replaced by the addition of smaller cells. To understand the essence of this type, we will explore history as a treasure trove and our collective cultural memory. As a large room to accommodate sleepers, it is determined by both idealistic features such as community and social belonging along with an efficient use of space. The dormitory is also a space of confrontation between the individual and the collective whole. If its design is dominated by the idea of sharing, it does not exclude the smallest individual unit of the bed – most of the time as a piece of furniture also expected to organise the plan.

The conference will look at the phenomenon from architectural, social, scientific and political perspectives in order to discuss what we can learn from this obsolete architectural type.